973
1.0

清秀佳人2016

导演:
约翰·肯特·哈里森
主演:
艾拉·巴伦坦,马丁·辛,萨拉·博茨福德,朱莉娅·拉隆德,凯特·亨尼格,斯特凡妮·金伯,琳达·卡辛,德鲁·黑淘格鲁,凯尔·盖特豪斯,坦妮斯·伯内特,理查德·宾斯利,索菲娅·罗伯茨,杰米·费吉,肖恩·麦卡恩,阿拉尼斯·佩尔特,娜塔莉娅·佩恩,伊莎贝拉·里克,汉娜·奇斯曼,佐伊·弗雷泽
别名:
未知
1.0
973人评分
英语
语言
未知
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:
改编自加拿大作家露西·莫德·蒙哥马利(Lucy Maud Montgomery)的同名长篇小说。2016年新拍版电视电影。住在爱德华王子岛艾凡里镇上的一对单亲兄妹马修·卡斯伯特和玛莉拉·卡斯伯特,原本打算领养一个男孩来帮忙农务,但领养中心却误送了一个女孩给他们,这个名叫安妮·雪莉的红发少女孤儿,满怀丰富的想像力并且能言善道,所有的自然景物在她的想象中,都变得能说话,有灵魂。原本发现弄错人的玛莉拉打算将安妮送回去,但马修却把安妮留了下来。
猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
833
8.0
已完结
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
8.0
更新时间:07月27日
主演:未知
简介:Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
1016
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
断网假期
452
9.0
HD
断网假期
9.0
更新时间:07月27日
主演:朱莉娅·罗伯茨,伊桑·霍克,凯文·贝肯,马赫沙拉·阿里,米哈拉·赫罗德,瓦妮莎·阿斯皮利亚加,法拉·麦肯齐,查理·埃文斯,乔什·德伦宁,艾瑞卡·赵,麦迪逊·杰西卡·贝内特,希瑟·李,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,杰西·金,马哈·赖特,赛义夫·穆赫辛,保罗·弗罗洛夫,凯文·肯尼,斯蒂芬妮·格罗夫斯,亚历克斯·巴伯
简介:在这部由屡获殊荣的编剧兼导演山姆·艾斯梅尔(《黑客军团》)执导的末世惊悚片中,阿曼达(奥斯卡金像奖得主朱莉娅·罗伯茨饰)和她的丈夫克莱(荣获奥斯卡金像奖提名的伊桑·霍克饰)租了一套豪华住宅,与孩子阿奇(查利·埃文斯)和罗丝(法拉·麦肯齐饰)共度周末。他们的假期很快就被两个陌生人 — G.H.(奥斯卡金像奖得主马赫沙拉·阿里饰)和他的女儿露丝(米哈拉饰)— 的到来所颠覆,这两个人得知发生了神秘的网络攻击,并在声称属于他们的房子里寻求庇护。两个家庭都面临着一场迫在眉睫的灾难,这场灾难越来越可怕,迫使每个人都不得不努力在这个崩溃的世界中找到自己的位置。《断讯》改编自鲁曼·阿拉姆荣获国家图书奖提名的小说,由 Esmail Corp、Red Om Films 制作,Higher Ground Productions 负责监制。
4446
2023
断网假期
主演:朱莉娅·罗伯茨,伊桑·霍克,凯文·贝肯,马赫沙拉·阿里,米哈拉·赫罗德,瓦妮莎·阿斯皮利亚加,法拉·麦肯齐,查理·埃文斯,乔什·德伦宁,艾瑞卡·赵,麦迪逊·杰西卡·贝内特,希瑟·李,亚历克西斯·蕾·佛伦哲,杰西·金,马哈·赖特,赛义夫·穆赫辛,保罗·弗罗洛夫,凯文·肯尼,斯蒂芬妮·格罗夫斯,亚历克斯·巴伯
凯马克
135
4.0
HD
凯马克
4.0
更新时间:07月27日
主演:萨拉·克利莫斯卡,卡姆卡·托西诺夫斯基,亚列克山大·米基克,西蒙娜·斯皮罗沃斯卡,安娜·斯托亚诺夫斯卡,菲利普·特拉伊科维奇,彼得·米尔切夫斯基,萨斯卡·迪米特罗沃斯卡,德扬·利利奇,索尼娅·米哈洛娃,莎拉·潘科沃斯卡,约尔德吉·约莱夫斯基,拉特卡·拉德玛诺维克,雅思米娜·瓦西莱娃,拉泽·马纳斯科夫,伊伦娜·库兹玛诺夫,伊万·科赛维斯基,克里斯特·罗德泽夫斯基,安吉拉·迪米托娃,马尔科·特拉约科维奇
简介:一对居住在高档公寓的富有的年轻夫妇与邻家住棚户房的中年夫妇有着完全不同的生活理念和生活方式,但他们却都面临着严重的的亲密关系问题,在如何解决这一问题上,他们竟然达成了类似的共识——引入第三个人,看似“畸形”的两个家庭在一定程度和一段时间内形成了某种平衡。当然,这种极度危险的平衡随时都可能会被打破......(華堅馮力士)
444
2022
凯马克
主演:萨拉·克利莫斯卡,卡姆卡·托西诺夫斯基,亚列克山大·米基克,西蒙娜·斯皮罗沃斯卡,安娜·斯托亚诺夫斯卡,菲利普·特拉伊科维奇,彼得·米尔切夫斯基,萨斯卡·迪米特罗沃斯卡,德扬·利利奇,索尼娅·米哈洛娃,莎拉·潘科沃斯卡,约尔德吉·约莱夫斯基,拉特卡·拉德玛诺维克,雅思米娜·瓦西莱娃,拉泽·马纳斯科夫,伊伦娜·库兹玛诺夫,伊万·科赛维斯基,克里斯特·罗德泽夫斯基,安吉拉·迪米托娃,马尔科·特拉约科维奇
首页
电影片
连续剧
综艺片
动漫片